As I said in a different thread there is a way to remove ALL .net stuff and start fresh, without something that requires it from 2.o forward. I will look for the specifics and post it.
Mark Dodge MD Computers Houston, TX -----Original Message----- From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of DSinc Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 4:42 PM To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com Subject: Re: [H] MS dot-NET Mark, I'd like to start as suggested. MS no longer lists their 'compendium' KB for v2.0. I am still doing reverse research to maybe find it. Conflicting MS docs indicate the dot-net will NOT install UNLESS there is an app previously installed the requires dot-net. OK. Now, I have to dig thru 5 other clients to find which app requires dot-net? Way too much fun. Good news: the old client is back up and running w/o BSODs and other odd crashes. This post suspect pata hd, suspect kbd, and, confirmed sagged psu. This dot-net business may just get down-graded to "future noise." Best, Duncan On 08/24/2010 16:57, Mark Dodge wrote: > Yes start with 2.0,, NOT 2.0 sp1 > > Mark Dodge > MD Computers > Houston, TX > > > -----Original Message----- > From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com > [mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Bobby Heid > Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 9:55 PM > To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com > Subject: Re: [H] MS dot-NET > > I love .Net! The positives are that it allows you to do so much with > so little code. > > As for a rebuild, I usually put 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0. Not a lot of > stuff uses 1.1 that I have come across. Windows update will put all > of those on, I think. > > Bobby > > -----Original Message----- > From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com > [mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of DSinc > Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 9:16 PM > To: Hardware Group > Subject: [H] MS dot-NET > > Some months back our collective convinced me that MS DOT-NET was > painless and may be beneficial in the future. > OK. I bit. I run it on 3 clients. It is here. It runs (I hope?). Still > do not see any positive or negative > effect......................until........... > I rebuild a machine from scratch. > > I have DOt-NET v3.5 sp1 on running clients. > I tried the optional v4 DOT-NET during last month's updates. It > bombed/failed. > Fine. I can stay at 3.5sp1. > I've read to being blind about DOT-NET. Yes, I have mostly RTFM! > > On a new install should I optionally install the OLD v1.1 DOT-NET base > to start the game again???? > Then I will just let MS Update do what MS Update does......... :) > Best, Duncan > > >
