Yes start with 2.0,, NOT 2.0 sp1 Mark Dodge MD Computers Houston, TX
-----Original Message----- From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Bobby Heid Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 9:55 PM To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com Subject: Re: [H] MS dot-NET I love .Net! The positives are that it allows you to do so much with so little code. As for a rebuild, I usually put 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0. Not a lot of stuff uses 1.1 that I have come across. Windows update will put all of those on, I think. Bobby -----Original Message----- From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of DSinc Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 9:16 PM To: Hardware Group Subject: [H] MS dot-NET Some months back our collective convinced me that MS DOT-NET was painless and may be beneficial in the future. OK. I bit. I run it on 3 clients. It is here. It runs (I hope?). Still do not see any positive or negative effect......................until........... I rebuild a machine from scratch. I have DOt-NET v3.5 sp1 on running clients. I tried the optional v4 DOT-NET during last month's updates. It bombed/failed. Fine. I can stay at 3.5sp1. I've read to being blind about DOT-NET. Yes, I have mostly RTFM! On a new install should I optionally install the OLD v1.1 DOT-NET base to start the game again???? Then I will just let MS Update do what MS Update does......... :) Best, Duncan
