I saw that it's USD 85 shipped from Newegg but not anymore. But surely the
prices are tumbling.



On 19 October 2010 05:16, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for the info.
>
> I am using a drobo fs and it is fully supported by drobo.
>
> But I have had my eye on those samsung drives for a long time now.
>
> Need to save up to get those beauties.
>
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone from Zain
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Chue <[email protected]>
> Sender: [email protected]: Mon, 18 Oct 2010
> 16:55:25
> To: <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [H] 2TB Drives
>
> If you're using RAID in your NAS box, Synology advises against using WD
> Green. Simply because it lacks TLER.
>
> The Samsungs are the way to go. F3EG (HD203WI) or the newer higher density
> 667GB per platter F4EG (HD204UI).
>
> On 21 September 2010 02:29, Naushad Zulfiqar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I actually have over 6 Green drives right now.
> >
> > I think he is referring to the new 4K sector format??
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Joshua MacCraw <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Growing pains? Can you elaborate because those are what I've been
> waiting
> > > to acquire for my next upgrade.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 9/20/2010 10:35 AM, dsinc218 wrote:
> > >
> > >> Zool,
> > >> I can not dabble with your 1st question at all. I use the "Barracuda"
> > >> and "Cheetah" series and have had very good service.
> > >> In my NAS forums, the WD Greens are having major growth pains. I know
> > >> nothing about a Samsung offering.
> > >> Best,
> > >> Duncan
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 09/20/2010 11:34, Naushad, Zulfiqar wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> What's the concensus on the best low power 2TB Drives.
> > >>>
> > >>> I need it for my NAS and don't need blazing speed, I need cool
> running
> > >>> operations.
> > >>>
> > >>> Should I get the Barracuda LP series or the WD Green, or the new
> highly
> > >>> touted Samsungs.......?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> >
> >
> > Zulfiqar Naushad
> >
>

Reply via email to