How is Hyper-V? We're still using VMware here and have no issues with it.

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 08:25:22AM -0600, Greg Sevart wrote:
> For the client side, you're pretty much spot on. However, if you do anything
> with Hyper-V on 2k8 R2/Hyper-V Server, the new dynamic memory feature is a
> really big improvement.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:hardware-
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Anthony Q. Martin
> > Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 6:29 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [H] SP1 for Windows 7 and Server 2008 R2
> > 
> > Other than bug & security holes fixes, there doesn't seem to be much to
> get
> > worked up about if you keep your setup patched up regularly.  Good to have
> > for new builds, though.
> > 
> > On 2/17/2011 7:16 AM, Stan Zaske wrote:
> > > I apologize for insinuating you into irritation. Perhaps I came off
> > > sounding too pompous. My bad!
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:23:59 -0600, Greg Sevart <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Oh, I certainly don't really care either, but I felt Stan's
> > >> insinuation that it was old news warranted further
> > >> clarification/correction. Official release of a service pack is a big
> > >> deal, even it had been leaked previously.
> > >>
> > >> That said, I typically wait until it's on Technet to apply big ticket
> > >> items like a SP to my non-bench boxes. Mission critical, no, but I
> > >> don't have the time or patience anymore to rebuild them if it goes
> > >> sour or MS pulls a late surprise.
> > >>
> > >> Frankly, I care more about stability on my home system than I do my
> > >> work box. :)
> > >>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:hardware-
> > >>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Bryan Seitz
> > >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 11:50 PM
> > >>> To: [email protected]
> > >>> Subject: Re: [H] SP1 for Windows 7 and Server 2008 R2
> > >>>
> > >>> lol unless it's for a business or production environment who cares
> > >>> if
> > >> people
> > >>> messed around with leaks/betas/whatever.  Don't be gay Greg.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:55:46PM -0600, Stan Zaske wrote:
> > >>> > None of my boxes are mission critical and therefor I consider them
> > >>> > to be experimental which falls right into line with my downloading
> > >>> > the official version as soon as it was released into the wild.
> Cheers!
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:14:42 -0600, Greg Sevart <[email protected]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > Not officially. For those of us that are more careful about the
> > >>> > > software we install, today marks the first day of official (and
> > >>> > > legal) release. The fact that the earlier leak was genuine is
> > >>> > > immaterial.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> > >> From: [email protected]
> > >>> > >> [mailto:hardware- [email protected]] On Behalf
> > Of
> > >>> > >> Stan Zaske
> > >>> > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 7:42 PM
> > >>> > >> To: [email protected]
> > >>> > >> Subject: Re: [H] SP1 for Windows 7 and Server 2008 R2
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> Thanks but it's been available for several weeks now and I've
> > >>> > >> long had it installed on my two Win7 boxes. By the by, Catalyst
> > >>> > >> 11.2 came out
> > >>> > > yesterday
> > >>> > >> for AMD video cards.
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:39:55 -0600, Greg Sevart
> > >>> > >> <[email protected]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> > I suspect many subscribers are already aware, but the final
> > >>> > >> > SP1 bits have been posted to MSDN and TechNet. General
> > >>> > >> > availability will be the
> > >>> > >> 22nd.
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> --
> > >>> > >> Using Opera's revolutionary email client:
> > >>> > >> http://www.opera.com/mail/
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > --
> > >>> > Using Opera's revolutionary email client:
> > >>> > http://www.opera.com/mail/
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>>
> > >>> Bryan G. Seitz
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> 

-- 
             
Bryan G. Seitz

Reply via email to