Andy Green wrote: > Decision is to go on with MSP430FG4618, if you have a better specific > proposal you want to suggest instead, go ahead in parallel.
So do we have a decision now ? I had hoped so, but today's chaos, err, meeting didn't sound like that at all. My position on the MPU hasn't changed: put in a chip that lets us move forward quickly and worry about optimization later. So I have no objection to the MSP430FG4618. (I'm assuming here that the MPU will be mainly your baby, so if you're comfortable with it, so am I.) - Werner _______________________________________________ hardware mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/hardware
