-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said: | Andy Green wrote: |> Decision is to go on with MSP430FG4618, if you have a better specific |> proposal you want to suggest instead, go ahead in parallel. | | So do we have a decision now ? I had hoped so, but today's chaos, err, | meeting didn't sound like that at all.
We go on with MSP430FG4618. Once we have it, we can also find out behaviours that the PMU will make if no MPU is present, and if we can use the less complex variant. | My position on the MPU hasn't changed: put in a chip that lets us move | forward quickly and worry about optimization later. So I have no | objection to the MSP430FG4618. Great, you are OK with the decision we made, so no need for posting big lists of alternatives then :-) I have updated the block diagram, but I have sent it to Wolfgang for review that it's OK to post here. - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkgR4bMACgkQOjLpvpq7dMoDAgCfbzumGJqXP2GX8btPX0EHe6tx qaUAmwUYziqlo74k4TwDUa+xR27hxVKu =/ofX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ hardware mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/hardware
