Oh, wait, you did push Jonathan's patch, thanks so much! Sorry I missed that first time around!
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Ed Trager <[email protected]> wrote: > Happy New Year, Behdad! > > Hey just wondering what do you think about Jonathan's patch (attached > below)? > > Best - Ed > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Jonathan Kew <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 12:09 PM > Subject: Re: [HarfBuzz] Change in HarfBuzz after version 0.90 ? > To: Ed Trager <[email protected]>, Danh Hong <[email protected]>, > Behdad Esfahbod <[email protected]> > Cc: Martin Hosken <[email protected]>, Richard Wordingham < > [email protected]>, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan < > [email protected]>, Harfbuzz <[email protected]> > > > On 27/12/13 16:21, Ed Trager wrote: > >> >> Hi, Martin, Richard, and Danh Hong, >> >> With regard to forcing the re-ordering of the >> UCD-enforced-but-totally-broken normalisation of TAI THAM TONE MARK plus >> U+1A60, does the following approach in the OpenType feature file make >> sense as the quickest and cleanest way to do it or not?: >> >> Basically the idea is to compose the out-of-order pair of characters >> into a ligature; and then take that ligature and decompose it back to a >> pair of characters that are in the correct order: >> >> If there is a better way to do this in OpenType, please enlighten me! >> :-) I was trying to get this to work last night, so far without success: >> >> > The trouble with this idea (or at least one trouble with it!) is that by > the time your lookups have a chance to do anything, harfbuzz has already > inserted dotted-circle glyphs because it treated the (normalized) sequence > as being a "broken" cluster. The pattern for a "consonant syllable" in the > SEAsian shaper allows for a <sakot, consonant> pair (i.e. a subjoined > consonant) among the various possible syllable-tail items, but it does not > allow for the <sakot> and <cons> to be separated by other marks, which is > what the normalization does. > > You -might- be able to work around this by explicitly including the dotted > circles in your ligature-composition rules, though that will make them all > more cumbersome. The better way forward is for us to fix harfbuzz, as > previously suggested. > > Possible patch attached; Behdad, wdyt? > > > >
_______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
