BTW there are a lot of other RFEs: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/top25_rfes.do Sun is asked to implement. Some of them are very interesting and could be implemented in Harmony as JDK extentions: struct/hotcode replacement/ftp support/logging support with ability to remove it from code like 'assert' keyword..
On 7/23/06, shen yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, AFAIK, SUN still does not support DTD 4.01 in JAVA 6.Refer to [1] May be they will wait for JAVA 7. And many developers are calling for DTD 4.01 support. IMO, it's a good idea to support DTD 4.01 in our project. Best regards [1]http://download.java.net/jdk6/docs/api/ 2006/7/22, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Which one should we follow? ¿Both? The parser behavior is parameterized > by > > a DTD, so perhaps we should provide a 3.2 DTD, to be compatible with > Sun, > > and a 4.01 DTD. > > Any ideas? > > > > Miguel Montes > > > > This RFE is about 7 years old and AFAIK SUN does not want to fix it in the > nearest feature: > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4296022 > Miguel, your proposal to support both versions sounds very reasonable. > This > way we can move a progress and to have influence on Java. > > -- > Mikhail Fursov > > -- Spark Shen China Software Development Lab, IBM
-- Mikhail Fursov
