Mikhail Fursov 写道:
BTW there are a lot of other RFEs:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/top25_rfes.do Sun is asked to implement.
Some of them are very interesting and could be implemented in Harmony as JDK
extentions: struct/hotcode replacement/ftp support/logging support with
ability to remove it from code like 'assert' keyword..

Oh, yes. There are a plenty f them. Not sure whether we will implment all these enhancement in this HDK version. May be these enhancements will be implemented in newer version of SDK. Do we also need to leave these new
features in newer version of our HDK?

Best regards

On 7/23/06, shen yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Yes, AFAIK, SUN still does not support DTD 4.01 in JAVA 6.Refer to [1]
May be they will wait for JAVA 7. And many
developers are calling for DTD 4.01 support. IMO, it's a good idea to
support DTD 4.01 in our project.

Best regards

[1]http://download.java.net/jdk6/docs/api/


2006/7/22, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Which one should we follow? ¿Both? The parser behavior is
parameterized
> by
> > a DTD, so perhaps we should provide a 3.2 DTD, to be compatible with
> Sun,
> > and a 4.01 DTD.
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Miguel Montes
> >
>
> This RFE is about 7 years old and AFAIK SUN does not want to fix it in
the
> nearest feature:
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4296022
> Miguel, your proposal to support both versions sounds very reasonable.
> This
> way we can move a progress and to have influence on Java.
>
> --
> Mikhail Fursov
>
>


--
Spark Shen
China Software Development Lab, IBM







---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to