Can we get Java 5 done first? ;) geir
Mikhail Fursov wrote: > BTW there are a lot of other RFEs: > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/top25_rfes.do Sun is asked to implement. > Some of them are very interesting and could be implemented in Harmony as > JDK > extentions: struct/hotcode replacement/ftp support/logging support with > ability to remove it from code like 'assert' keyword.. > > > On 7/23/06, shen yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Yes, AFAIK, SUN still does not support DTD 4.01 in JAVA 6.Refer to [1] >> May be they will wait for JAVA 7. And many >> developers are calling for DTD 4.01 support. IMO, it's a good idea to >> support DTD 4.01 in our project. >> >> Best regards >> >> [1]http://download.java.net/jdk6/docs/api/ >> >> >> 2006/7/22, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > >> > > Which one should we follow? ¿Both? The parser behavior is >> parameterized >> > by >> > > a DTD, so perhaps we should provide a 3.2 DTD, to be compatible with >> > Sun, >> > > and a 4.01 DTD. >> > > Any ideas? >> > > >> > > Miguel Montes >> > > >> > >> > This RFE is about 7 years old and AFAIK SUN does not want to fix it in >> the >> > nearest feature: >> > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4296022 >> > Miguel, your proposal to support both versions sounds very reasonable. >> > This >> > way we can move a progress and to have influence on Java. >> > >> > -- >> > Mikhail Fursov >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Spark Shen >> China Software Development Lab, IBM >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
