As Geir mentions, there a compiler difference's in Sun's JDK. The
changes are noticeable between 5.0_7 and 5.0_8. Note: Sun as released
5.0_9.

I'd prefer to be using ECJ for our compiler, but I haven't heard
anything lately about getting that back into the build scripts.

-Nathan

On 10/12/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Weldon Washburn wrote:
> My tools are:
>
> - WindowsXP
>    - MSVS .NET 2003
>    - ant-1.6.5
>    - Sun JDK 1.5.0_07_b03
>
> - Linux
>    - gcc 3.4.5
>    - ant-1.6.5
>    - IBM JDK 1.5.0_08_b03
>    - make 3.8.0
>
> How about the following first stab at Geir's idea of  "will work" tool
> chains?  The idea is to quickly converge the below so that I can call a
> vote
> on it.

I don't think we'll need a vote here - we'll be able to come to
agreement without that.

>
> -WindowsXP on laptop, Windows Server 2003 on servers
>     - MSVS .NET 2003
>    - ant-1.6.5
>    - Java JDK 1.5.0_xxxx
>
> - Linux
>    - gcc 3.4.xxx or higher
>    - ant-1.6.5
>    - Java JDK 1.5.0_xxxx
>    - make 3.8.0 or higher


We need a strict version of Java, I think, because IIRC, there was
problems with a recent patch level of the compiler from Sun.  I don't
remember how that was resolved.

I think that we also should try to switch completely to the eclipse
compiler, so we can include it as a downloaded dependency, and we all
are building using the same thing.

also, I'd like to define a "maximum" for the version of gcc/g++  - IOW,
we want to test up to 4.x.y, so when 4.x.z appears, we need to test first...

>
>
>
>
> On 10/12/06, Pavel Ozhdikhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> To update the statistics, my tools:
>>
>> - MS Windows Server 2003 / IA32:
>>       MSVS .NET 2003
>>       ant-1.6.5
>>       JRockit JDK 1.5.0_03
>>
>> - Linux / IA32:
>>       gcc 3.3.3
>>       GNU make 3.80
>>       ant-1.6.5
>>       JRockit JDK 1.5.0
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Pavel
>>
>> On 10/10/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I'm so sick of this gcc problem.
>> >
>> > Lets decide on the versions for GCC and other tools that "will
>> work".  I
>> > feel the same way that mark does re that being able to build on
>> multiple
>> > versions gives a better feeling of goodness and harmony in the universe
>> > and I encourage people to work on other versions (I will), but it's
>> > gotta be the case that we have a "reference toolchain" - that no matter
>> > what, it will work on there, and probably a list of tested versions
>> >
>> > So, what tools and what versions are people working with ?   here's a
>> > partial list of mine :
>> >
>> > 1) WinXP : Visual Studio .NET 2003
>> >
>> > 2) Linux x86 :
>> >     GCC : 3.4.6
>> >     g++ : 3.4.6
>> >     make : 3.81b4
>> >
>> > What are you using?  what other tools should we list?
>> >
>> > I recently setup a new machine (linux) and now have the complete
>> list of
>> > stuff that has to be installed (starting from fresh ubuntu6) and will
>> > post that on the getting started document on teh website.
>> >
>> >
>> > geir
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to