I'd prefer to be using ECJ for our compiler, but I haven't heard anything lately about getting that back into the build scripts.
Do we still have a problem with it? If so - I've been using ecj for building the classlib for quite a long time already (without any tricks with moving ecj jar from one place to another). I believe I've already posted my configs one or two months ago. Regards, 2006/10/13, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
As Geir mentions, there a compiler difference's in Sun's JDK. The changes are noticeable between 5.0_7 and 5.0_8. Note: Sun as released 5.0_9. I'd prefer to be using ECJ for our compiler, but I haven't heard anything lately about getting that back into the build scripts. -Nathan On 10/12/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Weldon Washburn wrote: > > My tools are: > > > > - WindowsXP > > - MSVS .NET 2003 > > - ant-1.6.5 > > - Sun JDK 1.5.0_07_b03 > > > > - Linux > > - gcc 3.4.5 > > - ant-1.6.5 > > - IBM JDK 1.5.0_08_b03 > > - make 3.8.0 > > > > How about the following first stab at Geir's idea of "will work" tool > > chains? The idea is to quickly converge the below so that I can call a > > vote > > on it. > > I don't think we'll need a vote here - we'll be able to come to > agreement without that. > > > > > -WindowsXP on laptop, Windows Server 2003 on servers > > - MSVS .NET 2003 > > - ant-1.6.5 > > - Java JDK 1.5.0_xxxx > > > > - Linux > > - gcc 3.4.xxx or higher > > - ant-1.6.5 > > - Java JDK 1.5.0_xxxx > > - make 3.8.0 or higher > > > We need a strict version of Java, I think, because IIRC, there was > problems with a recent patch level of the compiler from Sun. I don't > remember how that was resolved. > > I think that we also should try to switch completely to the eclipse > compiler, so we can include it as a downloaded dependency, and we all > are building using the same thing. > > also, I'd like to define a "maximum" for the version of gcc/g++ - IOW, > we want to test up to 4.x.y, so when 4.x.z appears, we need to test first... > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/12/06, Pavel Ozhdikhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> To update the statistics, my tools: > >> > >> - MS Windows Server 2003 / IA32: > >> MSVS .NET 2003 > >> ant-1.6.5 > >> JRockit JDK 1.5.0_03 > >> > >> - Linux / IA32: > >> gcc 3.3.3 > >> GNU make 3.80 > >> ant-1.6.5 > >> JRockit JDK 1.5.0 > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Pavel > >> > >> On 10/10/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > I'm so sick of this gcc problem. > >> > > >> > Lets decide on the versions for GCC and other tools that "will > >> work". I > >> > feel the same way that mark does re that being able to build on > >> multiple > >> > versions gives a better feeling of goodness and harmony in the universe > >> > and I encourage people to work on other versions (I will), but it's > >> > gotta be the case that we have a "reference toolchain" - that no matter > >> > what, it will work on there, and probably a list of tested versions > >> > > >> > So, what tools and what versions are people working with ? here's a > >> > partial list of mine : > >> > > >> > 1) WinXP : Visual Studio .NET 2003 > >> > > >> > 2) Linux x86 : > >> > GCC : 3.4.6 > >> > g++ : 3.4.6 > >> > make : 3.81b4 > >> > > >> > What are you using? what other tools should we list? > >> > > >> > I recently setup a new machine (linux) and now have the complete > >> list of > >> > stuff that has to be installed (starting from fresh ubuntu6) and will > >> > post that on the getting started document on teh website. > >> > > >> > > >> > geir
-- Alexei Zakharov, Intel Middleware Product Division --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
