Hi I am currently taking a class that is comparing RDA to AACR2. I am unhappy with certain changes that RDA is making. Module 4 in this training series: http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/trainthetrainer.html talks about changes to how the bible should be represented. It says that in the cases of individual books, like Genesis, we no longer are supposed to label it as Old Testament, just Genesis, Bible. I was wondering how others feel about this. I am wondering if this is a step back to other people, besides me when it comes to issues of a Christian bias. I want it to be labeled as the Old Testament and given a distinction that shows that it is a Jewish version and not a Christian version that has been published along with a New Testament related series that would be part of a Christian series. Has there been any discussion or complaints about this that I haven't seen yet or are Jews in agreement that this change is alright?
Rachel Fischer MLIS Student- Dominican University Volunteer Librarian- Oak Park Temple
__ Messages and opinions expressed on Hasafran are those of the individual author and are not necessarily endorsed by the Association of Jewish Libraries (AJL) ================================== Submissions for Ha-Safran, send to: [email protected] To join Ha-Safran, update or change your subscription, etc. - click here: https://lists.service.ohio-state.edu/mailman/listinfo/hasafran Questions, problems, complaints, compliments send to: [email protected] Ha-Safran Archives: Current: http://www.mail-archive.com/hasafran%40lists.service.ohio-state.edu/maillist.html Earlier Listserver: http://www.mail-archive.com/hasafran%40lists.acs.ohio-state.edu/maillist.html AJL HomePage http://www.JewishLibraries.org -- Hasafran mailing list [email protected] https://lists.service.ohio-state.edu/mailman/listinfo/hasafran
