On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Henning Thielemann wrote:

> On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Tim Chevalier wrote:
>
> > On 2/9/08, J. Garrett Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It looks like:
> > >
> > > http://darcs.haskell.org/non-negative/
> > >
> > > might be what you're looking for, but I haven't tested it, so others
> > > may know better.
> >
> > Thanks, I installed that.
>
> I'll upload them to Hackage soon.

I made compatible with GHC-6.8 and uploaded to Hackage, now. However
Haskore itself is not in a state to be widely applicable, thus I hesitate
to upload it to Hackage. I also still have no idea how to make it
compliant to GHC-6.4 (Data.FunctorM) and GHC-6.8 (Data.Traversable). I
think it can only be solved with some compatibility packages on Hackage,
which do not seem to exist.

> > I notice, though, that if I type "runhaskell Setup.lhs configure", I get:
> >
> > Configuring Haskore-0.0.2...
> > Setup.lhs: At least the following dependencies are missing:
> >     event-list ==0.0.5,
> >     midi ==0.0.4,
> >     markov-chain ==0.0.1,
> >     non-negative ==0.0.1,
> >     shell-pipe -any,
> >     fps -any,
> >     hosc -any,
> >     hsc3 -any,
> >     supercollider-ht -any
> >
> > which is certainly quite accurate, since I don't have those libraries.
> > But if I just do "make ghci" without doing the Cabal thing, I don't get
> > any warnings in advance.
>
> That's unfortunately true. The README is from the time before I extracted
> parts into separate packages. How can I make GHCi work without repeating
> dependency information from the Cabal file in the README?

I do now run 'Setup.lhs configure' before actually starting 'ghci'. I have
also adapted Readme accordingly.

> Also - you can eliminate the SuperCollider dependencies if you don't need
> them, because Haskore depends on some intermediate state of the
> SuperCollider interfaces.

I have now updated the packages such that you can use the 0.1 releases of
hosc and hsc3 from Hackage.
_______________________________________________
haskell-art mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lurk.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-art

Reply via email to