On 30 April 2013 09:28, Richard A. O'Keefe <o...@cs.otago.ac.nz> wrote:
> On 29/04/2013, at 10:04 PM, kudah wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:04:47 +1200 "Richard A. O'Keefe"
>> <o...@cs.otago.ac.nz> wrote:
>>> so that there is no possibility of catching errors early;
>>> by definition in that processor there are no errors.
>> Haddock's markup isn't any better in that regard.
> Did I praise Haddock?
>> I spent two hours on
>> my first day with haddock figuring out that I needed an empty comment
>> line before a code block. It didn't issue any warnings or errors either.
> Report that as a bug.
> For what it's worth, I've resurrected an old design I did and have
> been playing with it to see just how bad it really is to use something
> like @i<word> than _word_.

Everyone agrees it's useful to have @i<legible> markup :)

I'm impressed with Mateusz' balanced summary of the issues and look
forward to his GSoC project submission about _Markdown_.


Haskell-Cafe mailing list

Reply via email to