[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Coppin writes:
Out of curiosity... what's so bad about "stagnation"? (Otherwise
known as "having a fixed structure that everybody can rely on"...)
Oh come on, you know the answer, do you like provocations?
Shall I remind how many people are unhappy e.g., with the Haskell
Numerical classes hierarchy?... Stagnation is stagnation.
I guess I'm too used to Java's class library, which seems to change
every 12 hours or so. That's no fun at all! :-/
If something is broken, it should be fixed. If something isn't broken, I
see no reason to change it. You might call that "stagnation", but I view
it as something else...
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
