Andrew Coppin wrote:
If something is broken, it should be fixed. If something isn't broken, I see no reason to change it. You might call that "stagnation", but I view it as something else...
Nobody is talking about changing anything, at least not Data.Map. We're talking about why alternatives to Data.Map are apparently rejected out of hand for stupid, trivial and arbitrary reasons. Regards -- Adrian Hey _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
