Not only that, but what are your feelings on this library making the platform? I don't mean that in a nasty way, but after watching the effort to just get packages bumped by a version, the chance of one streaming library (out of a pool of many viable contenders) making it into the platform appears to be a very tough battle. Judging by your stance on void you presumably think that battle is winnable.
So i stand with Andrew - this only makes sense if you both believe in the platform and in your library joining it. Of course, you've convinced me pipes is the right abstraction - but do you truly believe you can convince everyone else? (Honest question) In terms of void, I don't really mind. Of course, my preference is to stick with void - its practically impossible to write anything without eventually depending on it or its dependencies these days. But I have no need to actually touch this type, so I don't mind either way. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haskell Pipes" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
