On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Gabriel Gonzalez <[email protected]> wrote: > > * Should we just reuse `http-client`/`http-client-tls`? Writing a `pipes` > wrapper on top of these would be very quick and painless and I could do it > myself in a couple of days. > > * Should we not use them and reuse something else (like Andrew's proposed > http-streams for `pipes`)?
Are these 2 options mutually exclusive? I've been looking forward for a pipes based equivalent of `http-streams` for some time, but by looking at `http-client-conduit`, it seems writing `http-client-pipes` would be quite straightforward, so it would make sense to focus on this first. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haskell Pipes" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
