Thanks for those links, very interesting. I'll shelve that idea for a bi-directional article then - look forward to your tutorial on the subject - I'm not sure I would have had much to write on the subject anyway.
On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:12:09 PM UTC+10, Gabriel Gonzalez wrote: > > I'm still reading your article, and I will give more comments later > today, but I just wanted to mention that there used to be a bidirectional > pipes tutorial back in the 3.* cycle: > > > https://hackage.haskell.org/package/pipes-3.3.0/docs/Control-Proxy-Tutorial.html#g:2 > > I deleted in the transition to 4.0.0, mainly because people were > complaining about the high complexity of `pipes` and one of the goals of > the 4.0.0 release was to show that you could program entirely in a > unidirectional subset of `pipes`. However, I plan to add a bidirectional > tutorial back again soon. > > You might also find this Stack Overflow answer I wrote helpful: > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23185690/event-handler-stack/23187159#23187159 > > On 5/21/14, 4:38 AM, Chris Mahon wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm working on an article titled pipes > deconstructed<http://cmahon.github.io/posts/pipes-deconstructed/>and would > really appreciate feedback before I put the final touches on it. > My aim is to explain the underlying co-routine mechanics via a reduction of > a simple example to Proxy form. While I found it useful to get to grips > with the pipes implementation for my own edification, I'm really not sure > whether anyone else would find this level of detail useful so apart from > any comments on style, correctness, etc., please let me know if I'm off on > a self-indulgent tangent of no wider interest! > > Was also thinking of writing a short article illustrating bi-directional > pipes usage as I couldn't find much detail on the subject in the pipes > tutorial and I leaned how to send data upstream while digging into the > pipes code. Simple example towards the end of a short note I just wrote on > fix. <http://cmahon.github.io/notes/haskell/#fix> > > I've just created my blog and the limited content that's there is all work > in progress at the moment so a bit rough and ready in places. > > Anyway, thanks in advance for your help, > > Chris > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Haskell Pipes" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:> > . > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haskell Pipes" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
