Alright, then I will try to complete the bidirectional tutorial as soon
as possible.
On 5/21/14, 7:13 AM, Chris Mahon wrote:
Thanks for those links, very interesting. I'll shelve that idea for a
bi-directional article then - look forward to your tutorial on the
subject - I'm not sure I would have had much to write on the subject
anyway.
On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:12:09 PM UTC+10, Gabriel Gonzalez wrote:
I'm still reading your article, and I will give more comments
later today, but I just wanted to mention that there used to be a
bidirectional pipes tutorial back in the 3.* cycle:
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/pipes-3.3.0/docs/Control-Proxy-Tutorial.html#g:2
<https://hackage.haskell.org/package/pipes-3.3.0/docs/Control-Proxy-Tutorial.html#g:2>
I deleted in the transition to 4.0.0, mainly because people were
complaining about the high complexity of `pipes` and one of the
goals of the 4.0.0 release was to show that you could program
entirely in a unidirectional subset of `pipes`. However, I plan
to add a bidirectional tutorial back again soon.
You might also find this Stack Overflow answer I wrote helpful:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23185690/event-handler-stack/23187159#23187159
<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23185690/event-handler-stack/23187159#23187159>
On 5/21/14, 4:38 AM, Chris Mahon wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working on an article titled pipes deconstructed
<http://cmahon.github.io/posts/pipes-deconstructed/> and would
really appreciate feedback before I put the final touches on it.
My aim is to explain the underlying co-routine mechanics via a
reduction of a simple example to Proxy form. While I found it
useful to get to grips with the pipes implementation for my own
edification, I'm really not sure whether anyone else would find
this level of detail useful so apart from any comments on style,
correctness, etc., please let me know if I'm off on a
self-indulgent tangent of no wider interest!
Was also thinking of writing a short article illustrating
bi-directional pipes usage as I couldn't find much detail on the
subject in the pipes tutorial and I leaned how to send data
upstream while digging into the pipes code. Simple example
towards the end of a short note I just wrote on fix.
<http://cmahon.github.io/notes/haskell/#fix>
I've just created my blog and the limited content that's there is
all work in progress at the moment so a bit rough and ready in
places.
Anyway, thanks in advance for your help,
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "Haskell Pipes" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
<javascript:>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Haskell Pipes" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haskell
Pipes" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
