I completed the unfinished parts of the article, mainly the reduction of the sample effect at the end. Will update with any feedback. thx, Chris
On Thursday, May 22, 2014 8:21:32 AM UTC+10, Gabriel Gonzalez wrote: > > Alright, then I will try to complete the bidirectional tutorial as soon > as possible. > > On 5/21/14, 7:13 AM, Chris Mahon wrote: > > Thanks for those links, very interesting. I'll shelve that idea for a > bi-directional article then - look forward to your tutorial on the subject > - I'm not sure I would have had much to write on the subject anyway. > > On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:12:09 PM UTC+10, Gabriel Gonzalez wrote: >> >> I'm still reading your article, and I will give more comments later >> today, but I just wanted to mention that there used to be a bidirectional >> pipes tutorial back in the 3.* cycle: >> >> >> https://hackage.haskell.org/package/pipes-3.3.0/docs/Control-Proxy-Tutorial.html#g:2 >> >> I deleted in the transition to 4.0.0, mainly because people were >> complaining about the high complexity of `pipes` and one of the goals of >> the 4.0.0 release was to show that you could program entirely in a >> unidirectional subset of `pipes`. However, I plan to add a bidirectional >> tutorial back again soon. >> >> You might also find this Stack Overflow answer I wrote helpful: >> >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23185690/event-handler-stack/23187159#23187159 >> >> On 5/21/14, 4:38 AM, Chris Mahon wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'm working on an article titled pipes >> deconstructed<http://cmahon.github.io/posts/pipes-deconstructed/>and would >> really appreciate feedback before I put the final touches on it. >> My aim is to explain the underlying co-routine mechanics via a reduction of >> a simple example to Proxy form. While I found it useful to get to grips >> with the pipes implementation for my own edification, I'm really not sure >> whether anyone else would find this level of detail useful so apart from >> any comments on style, correctness, etc., please let me know if I'm off on >> a self-indulgent tangent of no wider interest! >> >> Was also thinking of writing a short article illustrating bi-directional >> pipes usage as I couldn't find much detail on the subject in the pipes >> tutorial and I leaned how to send data upstream while digging into the >> pipes code. Simple example towards the end of a short note I just wrote on >> fix. <http://cmahon.github.io/notes/haskell/#fix> >> >> I've just created my blog and the limited content that's there is all >> work in progress at the moment so a bit rough and ready in places. >> >> Anyway, thanks in advance for your help, >> >> Chris >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Haskell Pipes" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Haskell Pipes" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:> > . > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haskell Pipes" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
