On 11/06/10 11:53, Dmitry Astapov wrote: > One one hand, parsec 3 is more versatile, on the other hand, parsec 2 is > often faster.
Is this even since parsec 3.1, whose main claim to fame was making parsec3 performance be comparable to parsec2 performance? http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2010-March/074076.html -Isaac _______________________________________________ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform
