+1 It would let us finally start healing the rift in the libraries and with Parsec 3.1 the performance difference is no longer a divisive concern.
-Edward On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Don Stewart <d...@galois.com> wrote: > Hey all, > > This is a loose end in the package policy situation: when the HP has a > major upgrade, the policy is to do all major upgrades for any packages > contained in the HP, as long as they don't add new dependencies. > > One exception to this rule has been parsec, where parsec 2 was > considered "blessed" on an ad hoc basis. > > I propose we agree to remove this ad hoc rule, and thus the HP will ship > with parsec 3. > > Does anyone have concerns with this? > > -- Don > _______________________________________________ > Libraries mailing list > librar...@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform
