On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Bryan O'Sullivan <b...@serpentine.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Antoine Latter <aslat...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Assuming we move the Parsec 'many' implementation into the Alternative >> class definition, this should have no/little impact on performance for >> all the combinators mentioned by Stephen. > > I can't speak for Parsec, but I certainly have a local definition of > "many" in attoparsec, because the Alternative version isn't inlined. > Makes a biggish difference to performance, though I do not recall the > magnitude (2x?). >
Ah, drat. However it looks like Parsec.Prim.many is not inlined. I thought at the instance declaration site I could include an INLINE pragma. Does that not work as one would hope? Antoine _______________________________________________ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform
