I'm quite comfortable with the idea. Guards are part of the lhs of an equation, and that is where binding takes place. The <- syntax worries me a bit, because in the comprehension use it has a different type, but the let syntax is available, and one can write "let p = e" "for p <- e". I think that, to reduce possible confusion, I would use, and teach, the let form. Given that, I don't object to the funny use of <-. --brian
- A new view of guards Simon L Peyton Jones
- Re: A new view of guards Lennart Augustsson
- Re: A new view of guards Manuel Chakravarty
- Re: A new view of guards Johannes Waldmann
- Re: A new view of guards Heribert Schuetz
- Re: A new view of guards Simon L Peyton Jones
- Re: A new view of guards Alex Ferguson
- Re: A new view of guards John Launchbury
- Re: A new view of guards Brian Boutel
- Re: A new view of guards Frank Christoph
- Re: A new view of guards Tony Davie
- Re: A new view of guards Andrew Moran
- Re: A new view of guards D. tweed
- Re: A new view of guards Greg Michaelson
- Re: A new view of guards Stefan Kahrs
- Re: A new view of guards Simon Marlow
- Re: A new view of guards Tony Davie
- Re: A new view of guards Libor Skarvada
- Re: A new view of guards Hans Aberg