> Is this a storm in a teacup? Much huff and puff for a seldom-occurring > situation? No! It happens to me ALL THE TIME. The Glasgow Haskell Compiler > is absolutely littered with definitions like clunky. I experience the same problem all the time as well and it drives me crazy. I think this proposal is brilliant in its simplicity, and we should by all means adopt it. It gives me a feeling akin to suddenly being able to reach around and scratch at an old itch in the small of my back. I am completely comfortable with using the <- notation here. It seems very natural to me, at least. Frank Christoph
- A new view of guards Simon L Peyton Jones
- Re: A new view of guards Lennart Augustsson
- Re: A new view of guards Manuel Chakravarty
- Re: A new view of guards Johannes Waldmann
- Re: A new view of guards Heribert Schuetz
- Re: A new view of guards Simon L Peyton Jones
- Re: A new view of guards Alex Ferguson
- Re: A new view of guards John Launchbury
- Re: A new view of guards Brian Boutel
- Re: A new view of guards Frank Christoph
- Re: A new view of guards Tony Davie
- Re: A new view of guards Andrew Moran
- Re: A new view of guards D. tweed
- Re: A new view of guards Greg Michaelson
- Re: A new view of guards Stefan Kahrs
- Re: A new view of guards Simon Marlow
- Re: A new view of guards Tony Davie
- Re: A new view of guards Libor Skarvada
- Re: A new view of guards Hans Aberg
- Re: A new view of guards Alex Ferguson