> Is this a storm in a teacup? Much huff and puff for a seldom-occurring
> situation?  No!  It happens to me ALL THE TIME.  The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
> is absolutely littered with definitions like clunky.  

I experience the same problem all the time as well and it drives me crazy.
I think this proposal is brilliant in its simplicity, and we should by all
means adopt it.  It gives me a feeling akin to suddenly being able to reach
around and scratch at an old itch in the small of my back.

I am completely comfortable with using the <- notation here.  It seems very
natural to me, at least.

Frank Christoph



Reply via email to