>That said, the more I think about it, I don't really believe that
>"Standard Haskell" will accomplish much.  The fact is that everyone
>wants many of the features in Haskell 2, and so even today would prefer
>using an implementation that is probably not fully compliant with
>anything that is "official" at all.

I feel that way, but I think that Richard Bird and other people using
Haskell in teaching may disagree.  (Come to think of it, wouldn't that
category include you too?)

--FC



Reply via email to