>That said, the more I think about it, I don't really believe that >"Standard Haskell" will accomplish much. The fact is that everyone >wants many of the features in Haskell 2, and so even today would prefer >using an implementation that is probably not fully compliant with >anything that is "official" at all. I feel that way, but I think that Richard Bird and other people using Haskell in teaching may disagree. (Come to think of it, wouldn't that category include you too?) --FC
- Felleisen on Standard Haskell Philip Wadler
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell David Barton
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Frank A. Christoph
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Simon L Peyton Jones
- Re: RE: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Daan Leijen
- RE: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Frank A. Christoph
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell David Bruce
- Re: RE: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Hans Aberg
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Fergus Henderson
- re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Scott Turner
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Hans Aberg
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell John O'Donnell