On 04-Aug-1998, Hans Aberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I should note that if one want the programs of an earlier version of a > computer language should be able top run on a later version, that can be > described by a monad. So why not implement an upgrade monad in Haskell? -- > It would solve the problem once and for all. Sounds like a great idea, I think you should go ahead and do it. Please be sure to let us know when you're finished. -- Fergus Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | "I have always known that the pursuit WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | of excellence is a lethal habit" PGP: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- the last words of T. S. Garp. Oh, sorry, I forgot the smiley... ;-)
- Felleisen on Standard Haskell Philip Wadler
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell David Barton
- RE: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Frank A. Christoph
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Simon L Peyton Jones
- Re: RE: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Daan Leijen
- RE: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Frank A. Christoph
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell David Bruce
- Re: RE: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Hans Aberg
- re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Fergus Henderson
- re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Scott Turner
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Hans Aberg
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell John O'Donnell
- re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell S. Achterop IWI-120 3932
- Re: RE: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Johannes Waldmann
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Philip Wadler
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Jon . Fairbairn
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Claus Reinke
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Jeffrey R. Lewis
- Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell Paul Hudak
