>>>>> "Colin" == Colin Runciman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Colin> * the name!
Colin> Names including a date, like Haskell 98, or a specific use,
Colin> like Teaching Haskell, could mislead. Standard Haskell 1 is
Colin> rather long (and ambiguous). The reasons why Haskell 1.5
Colin> suggests greater stability than Haskell 1.4 are too obscure.
Colin> So if Standard Haskell says too much, my vote goes to Stable Haskell.
Colin> If even that still sounds too much like a final resting point, rather
Colin> than a base for further development, how about Root Haskell or Stock
Colin> Haskell (or even Basic Haskell :-)?
I agree that Stable Haskell is a good name and would suggest the name
Current Haskell for the ongoing development of new and adventurous
features. Together, as Stable vs Current, I think the former will not
be mistaken as a final resting point.
Marko
