> Yes, I think it's a fine idea to loosen up the syntax and allow import and > infix anywhere. But could someone clarify what the intent is with regards to > the scoping of liberally sprinkled imports/infixes? I've added a clarification; my intent was that all <tt>import</tt> and <tt> fixity</tt> declarations would scope over the whole module, just like any other declaration. Simon
- some Standard Haskell issues Marko Schuetz
- Re: some Standard Haskell issues Jon . Fairbairn
- Re: some Standard Haskell issues Jeffrey R. Lewis
- Re: some Standard Haskell issues Simon Marlow
- Re: some Standard Haskell issues Jeffrey R. Lewis
- some Standard Haskell issues Colin . Runciman
- Re: some Standard Haskell issues Simon Marlow
- Re: some Standard Haskell issues Simon Marlow
- Simon L Peyton Jones