> I think this kind of thing is valuable... Hungarian notation [1]
> serves the same purpose in Windows C / C++ programming. It *is*
> valuable having canonical variable names for most situations; it reduces
the
> intellectual load on the (human) reader of the code... you don't have to
> check back to the type signature and argument list to figure out what a
> particular variable denotes; it's just obvious from the name.
But there are some stylistic camps, such as Eiffel's, that
prefer names with underscores rather than Hungarian notation
- claiming exactly the same reason: better readability. :-)
Jan
- Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a simple ca... Jonathan King
- RE: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a ... Frank A. Christoph
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a ... Keith Wansbrough
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a ... Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a ... Jonathan King
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a ... Craig Dickson
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a ... Christian Sievers
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a ... Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a ... Craig Dickson
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a ... Erik Meijer
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a ... Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a ... Friedrich Dominicus
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a ... Jan de Wit
