Jan Skibinski wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, Craig Dickson wrote: > > > I don't see that underscores serve readability in the same way as Hungarian > > notation purports to (unless the Eiffel people claim that underscores > > somehow convey type information?), so I don't see a conflict here. One could > > easily use both, e.g. n_widget_count for an integer value. > > The only readability advantage of underscores is when > someone starts including abbreviations within the names. > PAToVA? > PAtoVA? > PA_to_VA? [Whatever PA and VA means] > If that would be true we just can drop space between words. The closest to space in words is _. But it is completly unusual do write MixedCaSe in normal text. Just my 2 cents Friedrich
- RE: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a simpl... Frank A. Christoph
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a simpl... Keith Wansbrough
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a simpl... Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a simpl... Jonathan King
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a simpl... Craig Dickson
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a simpl... Christian Sievers
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a simpl... Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a simpl... Craig Dickson
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a simpl... Erik Meijer
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a simpl... Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a simpl... Friedrich Dominicus
- Re: Haskell conventions (was: RE: how to write a simpl... Jan de Wit
