> Personally I find the convention of using `a', `b', and `c' for type
> variables to be a poor one.  I much prefer using `t' (if there's
> only one) or `t1', `t2', ... (if there's more than one).
> I find that for me this makes it much easier to read type declarations,
> because names like `a', `b', and `c' sound like values, whereas names
> like `t1', `t2', and `t3' suggest types.

I *love* to use the same name for type variables and term variables, as in 

f :: a -> a
f = \a -> a

I also love to use the same name for type constructors and value constructors, as in

data Foo a = Foo a

Erik



Reply via email to