On Mon, 2 Dec 2002 13:05:27 -0500 "David Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> or using highly formal language, > with terms such as "catamorphisms". Ok I can't resist longer. It's ages I have been wondering what's a catamorphism, and an anamorphism, and what the hell does it mean "data is expressed by destructors and not by constructors", but I have had no time till now. Please some of you all catamorphism experts tell me a good and clear article to read :))) Vincenzo -- Teatri vuoti e inutili potrebbero affollarsi se tu ti proponessi di recitare te [CCCP] Il contenuto di questa e-mail può essere modificato e redistribuito purchè questa nota e il suo significato rimangano intatti. _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
