G'day all. On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 08:26:06AM +0100, Johannes Waldmann wrote:
> well I love design patterns, it's just that in Haskell-land > they are called higher-order functions, or polymorphic functions, etc. Can I safely translate that as "We use design patterns but we don't like the name?" In a different language, you use different design patterns. Just as iterator-based patterns are next to useless in Haskell (where we have lazy streams), patterns based on CPS are next to useless in a language with state and non-local return constructions. Cheers, Andrew Bromage _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
