G'day all. On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:27:21AM +0100, John Hughes wrote:
> There are patterns of that sort in our programs, which we would probably > rather call design techniques, which aren't so easily captured by a > higher-order function definition. As a matter of interest, _why_ would we rather call them "design techniques" than "design patterns"? Is it just an aversion to buzzwords, or are they fundamentally different? Cheers, Andrew Bromage _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
