On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:31:00AM -0500, Peter da Silva wrote: > Worse, you could have a NetApp, where the message would be buried > about 2/3 of the way down between a complete dump of the system > configuration, a blog about knitting that's been hijacked by Sicilian > CRT-cleaning-cloth spammers, and an ASCII picture of a leopard. Or at > least things that are about as useful. But at least with NetApp by the > time you noticed an important message you'd have gotten a call from > the front desk asking if you were expecting a package with the > replacement part in it. AND it would miraculously be the right > replacement part. Yes, we have many NetApp filers. We pay through the nose for them. But the vast majority of the time, the subject line of the email alerts tells you what's up, and for things like disks you don't even bother reading the alert because there's one waiting for you downstairs.
If you want to hate NetApp filers, how about mixed-mode filesystems?
(Sorry for the direct email Peter, I'm obviously the stupid monkey of
the day.)
--
/\oo/\
/ /()\ \ David Mackintosh |
[email protected] | http://www.xdroop.com
pgpQQIzjF6HBS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
