Hey Stack, The emails I'm seeing on hbase-issues look good. Replies are going to j...@apache.org which is what we want. Any replies should be appended by jira as comments to the relevant issues.
I think infra can only remove the reply-to for the hbase-issues list (list-wide config), so the created/resolved/etc message to hbase-dev will still need to be manually changed. But looks good to me. Thanks for seeing this through! --gh On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > Apache infrastructure claims the reply-to removed > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2533) but it still seems > to be there for me. For other folks too? If so, I'll reopen the > issue. Or, should the reply-to be j...@apache.org? > St.Ack > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Gary Helmling <ghelml...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think (maybe wrongly) that the Reply-To would have to be removed in the > > ezmlm config for hbase-dev. At least the direct emails I've gotten from > > reporting/watching emails don't have a Reply-To header. So I'm assuming > it > > only comes in from the listserv handling. I don't know ezmlm (though I'm > > checking the docs now). Any idea if there's a way to skip the Reply-To > list > > based on the message sender? Maybe another question for Owen? > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > >> I don't have perms to do that -- least the knobs don't show in JIRA > >> for me. Its Owen or infrastructure. Let me try OOM (Owen O Malley) > >> first. > >> St.Ack > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcry...@apache.org > > > >> wrote: > >> >> Anyone from the infrastructure group or with JIRA admin access able > to > >> >> comment? > >> > > >> > Stack is. > >> > > >> > I think all we need is instead of having the reply-to to > >> > hbase-...@apache.org, it should be j...@apache.org > >> > > >> > J-D > >> > > >> > > >
