'batch' BatchUpdate needs to know how many edits were applied so it can resume at the proper point in the list of edits.
as far as changing the 'regular' BatchUpdate to return the commit time, that seems like a good idea to me. --- Jim Kellerman, Powerset (Live Search, Microsoft Corporation) > -----Original Message----- > From: stack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 9:29 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: TimeStamp after commit > > Should we change the BatchUpdate so it returns the timestamp used > committing the edit? Currently it returns void (though the 'batch' > BatchUpdate returns number of edits applied). > St.Ack > > Slava Gorelik wrote: > > Hi.Is it possible to get the timestamp that batchupdate was commit with. > > Currently, I'm just trying to get row after commit and take it > timestamp, > > but i found that this cause about 20% overhead in my program. > > > > Best Regards. > > > > >
