> -----Original Message----- > From: stack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 11:12 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: TimeStamp after commit > > No. Its not. Please file an issue. This looks likes a simple addition > that will make for a big benefit. Maybe we should change the batching > BatchUpdate to return an array of timestamps. This way, count of > commits can be inferred from the size of the returned array?
That sounds like it would work.
