Hi. regular batchUpdate is also good for me, may be in new client API in 0.19.0 such functionality is planed ?
Best Regards. On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Jim Kellerman (POWERSET) < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 'batch' BatchUpdate needs to know how many edits were applied so > it can resume at the proper point in the list of edits. > > as far as changing the 'regular' BatchUpdate to return the commit > time, that seems like a good idea to me. > > --- > Jim Kellerman, Powerset (Live Search, Microsoft Corporation) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: stack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 9:29 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: TimeStamp after commit > > > > Should we change the BatchUpdate so it returns the timestamp used > > committing the edit? Currently it returns void (though the 'batch' > > BatchUpdate returns number of edits applied). > > St.Ack > > > > Slava Gorelik wrote: > > > Hi.Is it possible to get the timestamp that batchupdate was commit > with. > > > Currently, I'm just trying to get row after commit and take it > > timestamp, > > > but i found that this cause about 20% overhead in my program. > > > > > > Best Regards. > > > > > > > > > >
