> Aaron Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I'll put in a big request for this NOT to happen. I've dealt with >> some Ubuntu installations and I can't say that I really enjoy them. >> They seem to also have way to high of an overhead for what you get. >> If we actually wanted the things that we could get with that >> overhead, then maybe, but it seems like a complete waste. While >> we're talking about something like this (not that it's going to >> change anything) my personal preference would be to see either >> Slackware or OpenBSD on one of the servers; of course Debian is as >> good as any, and it's a very nice system, no reason really to change >> it that I see.
I don't know enough about Ubuntu to have much of an opinion of it vs. Debian. I would rather stay away from Slackware altogether. OpenBSD is nice where it fits, however one major problem is its SMP support is immature. The only machine of the three we will have soon at Peer1 where it makes sense to me to have OpenBSD would be on Abulafia, which is intended as a basic login/shell server. I would be happy to redo Abu with OpenBSD when it comes time to install it if the admins would like this--I have a good deal of experience with it. Any comments? -ntk _______________________________________________ HCoop-SysAdmin mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-sysadmin
