> On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 00:55:19 -0500 (EST) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I don't know enough about Ubuntu to have much of an opinion of it vs. >> Debian. I would rather stay away from Slackware altogether. OpenBSD is >> nice where it fits, however one major problem is its SMP support is >> immature. The only machine of the three we will have soon at Peer1 >> where >> it makes sense to me to have OpenBSD would be on Abulafia, which is >> intended as a basic login/shell server. I would be happy to redo Abu >> with >> OpenBSD when it comes time to install it if the admins would like >> this--I >> have a good deal of experience with it. Any comments? > > Why moving away from what works, and works well? We had no problem with > Debian, and all the admins who do the majority of work (Adam, Nathan and > me) > are most familiar with it. > > If we are going to expand our infrastructure, use advanced setups like > Kerberos, LDAP and AFS, and introduce automation, and thing like that, > then the last thing we need is operating system diversity. > > -doc
I personally am really better with debian than openbsd. I know Kerberos and LDAP are both well-supported, but you make a good point. I don't know about AFS, and having the distribution be the same across servers would simplify things. -ntk _______________________________________________ HCoop-SysAdmin mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-sysadmin
