I never heard what the conclusion was about the problems mentioned on the list re: running postgres and (most likely mysql) on an AFS filesystem. I assumed that because there were problems mentioned we would go to something like running these packages off of an ext3 filesystem, which would require reformatting the /data partition of deleuze.
Sorry I didn't mention this earlier, but I wanted to make sure that we took care of this issue before migrations kept us locked into our current configuration. Thanks! Justin Christopher D. Clausen wrote: > Davor Ocelic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hello folks, >> >> I'd like to slowly start migrating members to the new >> infrastructure. Not everything is ready, and I think a couple >> of 'test migrations' would give us this extra drive we need >> to get everything finished. >> >> Do you see any problems with this idea? >> > > Uhh, "new infrastructure" meaning AFS and Kerberos? How exactly do > users set Kerberos passwords? Same way original password were assigned? > (File in home directory?) > > Also, I suggest NOT running the 1.5.12 openafs build. Stick with the > 1.4.x series for now. (1.4.3 RC1 was released yesterday.) I believe > that there was a problem with one of the fsync patches in 1.5.12 that > caused data loss for ceretain sites. Just FYI. (I haven't had problems > myself, but then I'm on Solaris, not Linux.) > > Any plans to add AFSDB records to DNS for ease of use for those of us > wishing to test things from home? > > <<CDC > > > > _______________________________________________ > HCoop-SysAdmin mailing list > [email protected] > http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-sysadmin > _______________________________________________ HCoop-SysAdmin mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-sysadmin
