Hi Ely,

If you perform the same steps shown in the fix_3_clean.m file on the same data, 
you should get the same results.



 on behalf of "Ely, Benjamin" 
Date: Friday, September 16, 2016 at 12:17 PM
To: "HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org>" 
Subject: [HCP-Users] MELODIC denoising vs. released ICA-FIX datasets

Hi all,

I ran a test recently comparing "aggressive" vs. "soft" denoising in MELODIC on 
an HCP resting-state run, regressing out the "bad" components found in the 
rfMRI_REST1_LR_hp2000.ica/.fix file (I believe the location of this info is 
different in the newer release but I'm working off HCP500 data). Both denoising 
methods gave similar results which also looked similar to the released HCP 
ICA-FIX denoised timeseries (i.e. rfMRI_REST1_LR_hp2000_clean.nii.gz), but I 
expected the soft denoised MELODIC output to be identical, which it was not. Is 
there a step I'm missing, or did you run the ICA component regression with a 
different tool?

Thank you!

HCP-Users mailing list

The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.

HCP-Users mailing list

Reply via email to