[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14314685#comment-14314685
 ] 

Jing Zhao commented on HDFS-7716:
---------------------------------

Thanks for the comments, Zhe!

bq. What if we are removing an over-replicated slot? I guess we should still 
swap it with the last node, to avoid growing triplets too much?

This will not cause triplets growing too much because the empty slots after 
{{dataBlockNum + parityBlockNum}} will be reused when adding new 
over-replicated storages. We can leave the empty slots there or we can choose 
to shrink the triplets array. Currently I just keep the empty slots to avoid 
copying the whole array.

bq. This is to guarantee indices has the same size as triplets?

Actually this is to make sure the {{newBlock}} has enough size to store all the 
triplets (including over-replicated blocks).

> Erasure Coding: extend BlockInfo to handle EC info
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-7716
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7716
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Jing Zhao
>            Assignee: Jing Zhao
>         Attachments: HDFS-7716.000.patch, HDFS-7716.001.patch
>
>
> The current BlockInfo's implementation only supports the replication 
> mechanism. To use the same blocksMap handling block group and its data/parity 
> blocks, we need to define a new BlockGroupInfo class.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to