[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14499965#comment-14499965
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-7993:
---------------------------------
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12726133/HDFS-7993.5.patch
against trunk revision 76e7264.
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/10298//testReport/
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/10298//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Incorrect descriptions in fsck when nodes are decommissioned
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-7993
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7993
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.6.0
> Reporter: Ming Ma
> Assignee: J.Andreina
> Attachments: HDFS-7993.1.patch, HDFS-7993.2.patch, HDFS-7993.3.patch,
> HDFS-7993.4.patch, HDFS-7993.5.patch
>
>
> When you run fsck with "-files" or "-racks", you will get something like
> below if one of the replicas is decommissioned.
> {noformat}
> blk_x len=y repl=3 [dn1, dn2, dn3, dn4]
> {noformat}
> That is because in NamenodeFsck, the repl count comes from live replicas
> count; while the actual nodes come from LocatedBlock which include
> decommissioned nodes.
> Another issue in NamenodeFsck is BlockPlacementPolicy's verifyBlockPlacement
> verifies LocatedBlock that includes decommissioned nodes. However, it seems
> better to exclude the decommissioned nodes in the verification; just like how
> fsck excludes decommissioned nodes when it check for under replicated blocks.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
