[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207662#comment-15207662
]
Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HDFS-9694:
-------------------------------------------
{quote}
I guess I'd better incorporate the change in the patch to be in together, so we
may avoid the further change into the protocol. Sounds good?
{quote}
I would recommend not to incorporate future related changes in this JIRA. Let
that change go into other JIRA when thats needed. I just wanted to know your
idea because, if the plan is not by handling with flag, then op name might need
to refine. But flag is good idea in general. So, I am good with flag and leave
that change to next JIRA.
> Make existing DFSClient#getFileChecksum() work for striped blocks
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-9694
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9694
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Kai Zheng
> Assignee: Kai Zheng
> Attachments: HDFS-9694-v1.patch, HDFS-9694-v2.patch,
> HDFS-9694-v3.patch, HDFS-9694-v4.patch, HDFS-9694-v5.patch,
> HDFS-9694-v6.patch, HDFS-9694-v7.patch
>
>
> This is a sub-task of HDFS-8430 and will get the existing API
> {{FileSystem#getFileChecksum(path)}} work for striped files. It will also
> refactor existing codes and layout basic work for subsequent tasks like
> support of the new API proposed there.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
