[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14049090#comment-14049090
 ] 

Haohui Mai commented on HDFS-6609:
----------------------------------

The patch looks good to me. Some comments:

1. in {{INodeDirectory}}:
{code}
-  @VisibleForTesting
-  protected static void dumpTreeRecursively(PrintWriter out,
+  public static void dumpTreeRecursively(PrintWriter out,
{code}

Is the deletion of {{VisibleForTesting}} accidental?

{code}
-  protected static class SnapshotAndINode {
+  public static class SnapshotAndINode {
{code}

2. Is it possible to make {{SnapshotAndINode}} a package local class?

3. Now there're both {{DirectoryWithSnapshotFeature}} and 
{{DirectorySnapshottableFeature}}, it might be worthwhile to add some comments 
to document it.

4. {{DirectorySnapshottableFeature}} should have the 
{{\@InterfaceAudience.Private}} annotation.

> Use DirectorySnapshottableFeature to represent a snapshottable directory
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6609
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6609
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: namenode
>            Reporter: Jing Zhao
>            Assignee: Jing Zhao
>         Attachments: HDFS-6609.000.patch
>
>
> Currently we use INodeDirectorySnapshottable to represent a snapshottable 
> directory. When we set a directory to snapshottable, we also need to replace 
> the corresponding INode. It will be better to use a 
> DirectorySnapshottableFeature to simplify the process and get rid of the 
> inode replacement.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to